Update JUNE 2018

The anti-declawing bill in New Jersey is back on the table. I’ve asked the CEO of St Hubert’s to confirm this info that was given to me from two employees at their North Branch location. One employee said that St Hubert’s supports the anti-declawing bill but only with allowances for the elderly with thin skin and for immune compromised people (people on chemo)

Another employee said that St Hubert’s supports advocacy of not declawing cats but would not comment on any specifics about the anti-declawing bill. He directed me to their very confusing position statement on their website. “St Hubert’s is opposed to declawing domestic cats and debarking surgery in dogs to modify behavior and whenever not medically necessary.”

So if St Hubert’s is against declawing cats for behavioral reasons and says it should only be performed if the cat has a medical reason, then surely they must be supporting this bill. Or…does the medical reason mean if the human has thin skin or immune compromised issues? https://www.sthuberts.org/policies-positions/

PLEASE TRY TO GET AN OFFICIAL ANSWER FROM THEM- ALL THEIR CONTACT INFO IS ON HERE www.sthuberts.org

UPDATE. JANUARY 2018. I received an email from the CEO and PRESIDENT of ST. HUBERT’S ANIMAL WELFARE CENTER AFTER I ASKED HER IF ST. HUBERT’S WILL BE SUPPORTING THE ANTI-DECLAWING BILL THAT WILL HAVE NO EXEMPTION FOR HUMAN HEALTH AND WILL HAVE A CIVIL OFFENSE AS THE PUNISHMENT AND NOT JAIL TIME. (SHE STOLD ME THEY ARE AGAINST “CRUELTY TO VETERINARIANS” SO I KNEW THAT WOULD BE GOOD NEWS TO HER ABOUT THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE CHANGED TO A CIVIL OFFENSE)

SO THAT I DON’T GET ACCUSED OF NOT ACCURATELY PORTRAYING HER COMMUNICATION WITH ME, I WILL SHARE THE EMAIL THIS CEO AND PRESIDENT SENT ME ON JANUARY 1, 2018. A COUPLE THINGS THAT I REMINDED HER ARE THAT I AM NOT ATTACKING THE VETERINARY COMMUNITY. I SHINE LIGHT ON UNETHICAL WAYS THAT THE VETERINARY COMMUNITY AND OTHER ORGINATIONS ARE ADDRESSING DECLAWING. I SHINE LIGHT ON ORGANIZATIONS AND PEOPLE WHO SHOULD BE HELPING US END DECLAWING BUT AREN’T. I ALSO ASKED HER THAT JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE CAN DRIVE SOMEWHERE ELSE, DOES THAT MEAN WE SHOULDN’T HAVE LAWS TO PROTECT ANIMALS FROM HARM? I ALSO ASKED IF SHE READ MY STUDY AND IF SHE WAS AT ALL CONCERNED THAT SO MANY VETS IN NEW JERSEY (AND AMERICA) ARE MAKING A LOT OF MONEY FROM DECLAWING. http://www.citythekitty.com/studynjvetsdeclawing/

HERE IS THE EMAIL SHE SENT ME ON JANUARY 1, 2018.

Hi Lori,

I have answered you several times and again, I don’t believe that you accurately portray our communications. I’ll give it one last try, too, in earnest:

I communicated last year that we have a debark ban in NJ and that aligning declaw and debark is the logical path to support awareness (among many parties) and enforcement. That alignment would not have jail time for veterinarians, correct. It would put licensure on the line for veterinarians and hold individual pet guardians accountable, something not in the original bill. Pennsylvania, New York and Delaware are less than 2 hour drives from virtually any point in NJ. Please think about this reality.

My communications to legislators and others included statements that destructive behavior is not a significant reason for surrender, nor is it a top call to our pet helpline and therefore that a ban, in our expert opinion, would not increase relinquishment (and the corresponding alarm of euthanasia), as is claimed by some in the veterinary community.

We have very few declawed cats coming into our shelters and those that are declawed are older than all other non-kitten cats (kitten data removed as it would skew the analysis). We see this as a clear sign of the declining trend of declawing and we compared our data with another larger NJ shelter and they had similar findings. The messaging we’ve all been doing against declawing is working.

Your approach of attacking the veterinary community on a wholesale level is concerning and we will not subscribe to such an approach. Recently, 25 NJ veterinarians – most we never had relationships with before – came and volunteered at St. Hubert’s to help the 1,212 dogs and cats (and three pot-bellied pigs) that came to us from Hurricane Harvey, Irma & Maria impacted areas this Fall. Thanks to them, those cats and dogs (and pigs) got a second chance and it simply would not have been possible in that tight timeframe without them. Their enthusiasm was palpable and it was a great bridge builder between the welfare and veterinary community.

We hope that you can ‘hear’ the ways that NJ veterinarians are supporting animal welfare, including feline specific initiatives such as ever-increasing support and engagement with trap-neuter-return, which will do more to end the euthanasia and suffering of felines in NJ than any other initiative based on today’s intake dynamics.

Lori, you’ve told me that this issue is your life, that you’ve liquidated your retirement savings to work on the issue. I’d like to invite you to attend a compassion fatigue session we’re having at St. Hubert’s in April. We work to have a session each year for our staff and for the welfare community as part of our professional education series. It’s an earnest invitation. As soon as we have the date, I’ll send it over to you. Someone from Mercy for Animals just advised me that the book, “Trauma Stewardship” quote Changed her life, unquote, and was how she was able to remain in animal protection. I ordered the book but can’t yet give you my take on it.

Meanwhile, I restate that St. Hubert’s works with others throughout animal protection. We offer and expect professional, respectful dialogue. We are opposed to declawing and cosmetic procedures. We will wait for the new language to comment further on any proposed ban on declawing. We commented fully and officially this past session and would do same again.

Cheers to better communication in 2018,

Heather J. Cammisa, CAWA

President & CEO

St. Hubert’s Animal Welfare Center

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————

I wanted to share something with all of you that’s been heavy on my mind and I’m very confused. I need your help.
One of the things I do is help get cat rescues, donors, nonprofits, and shelters to support our important anti-declaw bills. I have lots of conversations with their management and I give them factual info and answer their questions etc, so they have all the facts to make a sound decision.

Sometimes I get to have great dialogues with wonderful organizations who understand that cat declawing is animal cruelty and animal abuse, and they naturally and logically support the bill.

But sometimes I have dialogues with these organizations who send mixed messages that I just can’t understand (even after asking some of my smart friends 😸).

St. Hubert’s Animal Welfare Center (in Madison, NJ with other locations throughout northern NJ) is a state leader in animal welfare; they do tremendous work for cats and dogs and they’re really progressive with a lot of great programs. They also have a dream animal shelter facility. Many declawed cats have been adopted from St. Hubert’s over the years.

I started having a dialogue with the St. Hubert’s CEO, Heather Cammisa, starting in February of this year 2017, about their support for the anti-declawing bill in NJ.

I was sad to hear in my phone call with Heather in February that St. Hubert’s does NOT support the bill that passed the NJ State Assembly in 2016. Instead, St. Huberts wanted to send the bill sponsors (legislators) two amendments to be made to the bill.

Now some of you who are new to bills and lawmaking may not know that one sneaky way to stop a bill is to make amendments to it. Basically, amendments could gut the bill.  You’ve heard of loopholes so big that you could drive a truck through them, right? Think “amendments”…

Anyway, I don’t want to believe that St. Huberts — being such a leader in animal welfare — would do such a thing, so, of course, I asked what those amendments were, before jumping to any conclusions.

I’m still waiting to hear back from Heather as to what the two amendments are.  I received an email from her co-worker last week that said this: “St. Hubert’s is opposed to the surgical declawing of cats except in rare circumstances.  We’ve advised though that we cannot support the bill in its current form and have written to the sponsors with our suggestions.”

Now I’m getting really concerned what those amendments are. We know the NJVMA is fighting this bill, by hiring the state’s top lobbying firm, at great expense. I know that a lot of NJ shelters, including St. Huberts, use NJVMA vets or have NJVMA vets on their board of directors.
I’m really happy that the St. Hubert’s CEO is engaging in this thoughtful and important dialogue with me, and I REALLY hope that our discussion will lead to St. Hubert’s supporting the bill without exceptions for human health issues.

But I’m confused by their proposed amendments. My question for Heather is, if the bill is not amended to allow declawing for human health reasons, will St. Hubert’s not support the bill?

Maybe all of you can help me inspire St. Hubert’s to support this important cat protection bill (without any bad amendments), the way that North Shore Animal League did for the bill in NY, without any amendments:

Please let St. Hubert’s know how much you appreciate all they’ve done to re-home so many cats and kittens, as well as TNR programs for community cats, and we know that they are against cat declawing St. Hubert’s Declawing Position/Policy , so why won’t they support the anti-declaw bill that was passed by the NJ State Full Assembly?

Please go to their Facebook page St. Hubert’s Facebook Page and their other social media pages and respectfully ask them if they will support the bill without the human health amendment and let them know you will give them a 5 star review if they do! Also please email them at info@sthuberts.org  We desperately need their support!

ALSO PLEASE ASK THEM TO PUT A NO-DECLAW CLAUSE IN THEIR ADOPTION CONTRACTS!

St. Huberts is responding to many of your comments by saying they can’t support the bill as it is.
The bill was created and written very carefully for a reason, to protect the cats and not weaken anti-declawing laws elsewhere. Ask them, why are they trying to make changes to this bill, and what are those changes that they want?

St. Hubert’s Animal Welfare Center is such a leader, progressive and transparent, with clear position statements. So why the secrecy about trying to change the declaw bill? If they are good, legitimate changes, why not be open and transparent about them? We are all on the same side, against declawing, right?

Also, you can write a donation check to St. Huberts and say that they can only cash it when they support this bill without a human health amendment!

I can’t do this without your help! If you get an answer please send it to citythekitty@gmail.com ASAP! 

The mission statement that St. Huberts.org has on their website is, “St. Hubert’s Animal Welfare Center is dedicated to the humane treatment of animals. We believe in and provide services that support the human-animal bond and seek to foster an environment in which people respect all living creatures.

Let’s respectfully remind them that there is no room for declawing in their mission statement!

Thank you,

Love,

City

___________________________________________________________________________

Here is a story that I did about how cats should NOT be declawed for immune compromised reasons. Declawing is NOT recommended for immune compromised people or people with thin skin or bleeding disorders

Please go to www.citythekitty.com and sign up to be a City the Kitty Crusader and help us end declawing once and for all!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Stay Informed

You have Successfully Subscribed!